A3.4
Question 1 Single best answer Level 1 1 point
Two simulation frames give two sets of coordinates for one protein. What does superposing them do before they are compared, and why?
- It translates and rotates one onto the other, so whole-molecule motion is not counted as a difference
- It lines up the two sequences residue by residue, so a shift in numbering is not counted as a difference
- It keeps only the atoms chosen for comparison, so side-chain motion is not counted as a difference
- It averages the two into one structure, so frame-to-frame noise is not counted as a difference
Question 2 Single best answer Level 1 1 point
An RMSD is reported between a simulation frame and the crystal structure. What does that value tell you about the two structures?
- How much the two differ overall, as one length that grows as they differ more
- Where the two differ most, as one value taken at the region that moved farthest
- To what extent the frame has drifted from its start, as one rate taken along the run
- What kind of change separates them, as one value that tells a hinge bend from unfolding
Question 3 Single best answer Level 2 1 point
Two structures lie the same RMSD from one reference. In one, a few residues moved far; in the other, every residue moved slightly. How can such different changes give the same RMSD?
- It averages each atom’s motion over time into one fluctuation, and both structures fluctuate by the same amount
- It turns the atoms’ moves into one energy cost, and both changes cost the protein the same energy
- It condenses the atoms’ displacements into one length, and both changes have the same overall size
- It averages the atoms’ positions into one center, and both changes moved that center by the same distance
Question 4 Single best answer Level 4 1 point
A report claims that a protein’s overall fold changed during a simulation. Which RMSD plot, taken against the starting structure, would support the claim, and why?
- An all-atom RMSD that jumps partway through the run and then levels off higher, since all atoms track the global fold more fully
- An alpha-carbon RMSD that rises in the first few nanoseconds and then levels off, since alpha carbons track the global fold
- An alpha-carbon RMSD that jumps partway through the run and then levels off higher, since alpha carbons track the global fold
- An all-atom RMSD that rises in the first few nanoseconds and then levels off, since all atoms track the global fold more fully
Question 5 Single best answer Level 3 1 point
In a simulation of one protein, the alpha-carbon RMSD stays low and steady throughout. Partway through, the backbone heavy-atom RMSD for the same frames steps up to a higher plateau. What does this comparison show about the protein?
- The fold held, and the backbone step is noise, since a broader selection adds noise to an RMSD
- The fold changed, and a domain rotated partway through, since a sudden rise in the backbone RMSD marks a structural transition
- The fold changed, but the alpha-carbon value missed it, since the same frames should give one RMSD
- The fold held, but a backbone segment changed, since the rise lies in atoms beyond the alpha carbons
Question 6 Single best answer Level 3 1 point
In two superposed structures, most atoms barely moved, but a handful moved far. The RMSD is recomputed leaving out either that handful or an equal number of barely moved atoms. Which choice changes the value more, and why?
- Leaving out the barely moved handful, because the structures are superposed again first, which fits away the far-moved handful’s displacement
- Leaving out the far-moved handful, because the value is the largest single move in the selection, which their removal lowers
- Leaving out the barely moved handful, because the structures are superposed on the barely moved atoms, and losing some raises the other squared terms
- Leaving out the far-moved handful, because each one’s squared displacement adds far more to the sum
Question 7 Single best answer Level 2 1 point
Throughout a simulation, one residue stays far from its position in the reference structure but is nearly motionless. Is that residue’s RMSF large or small, and why?
- Small, because RMSF measures how far the residue moves from one frame to the next
- Small, because RMSF measures the residue’s spread about its own average over the frames
- Large, because RMSF measures how far the residue has moved from where the run started
- Large, because RMSF averages the residue’s distance from the reference structure over all the frames
Question 8 Single best answer Level 3 1 point
HIV-1 protease’s flaps rank high, and helices and strands low, in both RMSF and B-factor. One loop, the only region touching a neighboring molecule in the crystal, ranks high in RMSF but low in B-factor. Which regions move most, and why do its rankings disagree?
- The flaps and the loop; its crystal contact leaves the loop poorly fixed by the data, which lowers its B-factor
- The flaps and the loop; its crystal contact holds the loop still there, which lowers its B-factor
- Only the flaps; packing in the crystal makes the loop rigid, so its RMSF peak is a simulation artifact
- The flaps and the loop; the loop takes a different shape in different unit cells, which lowers its B-factor
Question 9 Single best answer Level 2 1 point
The potential energy along one coordinate has a narrow and a wide well of equal depth. On a free-energy surface built from frame counts along that coordinate, which well is the favored state, and why?
- Neither well, because the narrow well’s fewer bins each hold more frames, which makes up for the wide well’s extra bins
- The wide well, because the molecule spends more of the run within its range
- The wider well, because its greater width gives it the lower enthalpy of the two
- Neither, because a surface built from counts holds relative free energies, which leave the two wells unranked
Question 10 Single best answer Level 3 1 point
From one trajectory of a protein, a free-energy surface along RMSD from the starting structure shows a single basin. What does that single basin show about the protein’s states?
- It allows several states, since a domain rotation and a partial unfolding can give the same RMSD
- It shows one state, since a single basin means the frames share one structure
- It allows several states, since superposing each frame removes the motion of one part against another
- It shows one state, since RMSD takes in the protein’s atoms and so can capture its whole structure
Question 11 Single best answer Level 4 1 point
From one trajectory of a two-domain protein, a free-energy surface along a hydrogen-bond distance inside one domain shows a short-distance and a long-distance basin. A surface along the interdomain distance shows a domains-close and a domains-apart basin. Which conclusion about the protein’s states do the two surfaces support together?
- Two or four states; a longer run would show whether the basins pair one to one or in every combination
- At least two states; matching one surface’s basins to the other’s needs a surface over both distances
- Exactly two states, pairing the short-distance basin with the domains-close basin as one set of frames
- Exactly two states, since each surface from one trajectory shows two basins, so they agree
Question 12 Single best answer Level 3 1 point
Bin P of a free-energy surface holds ten times as many frames as bin Q. Which bin lies lower, and how does the free-energy difference between them change if that ratio is multiplied by ten again, or instead inverted?
- Q lies lower; another factor of ten multiplies the difference by ten, and inverting puts P lower by the same amount
- P lies lower; another factor of ten doubles the difference, and inverting puts Q lower by the same amount
- Q lies lower; another factor of ten doubles the difference, and inverting puts P lower by the same amount
- P lies lower; another factor of ten multiplies the difference by ten, and inverting puts Q lower by the same amount